Ultimately, Robert's observation relates to the importance of the examined life by reminding us to be aware of our habits of fantasizing. It is likely possible, for imagining the multitude of ways to improve one's professional lives comes quite easily to most of us. Perhaps, the commuters would rather be doing something other than going to work. This is inferred by their preoccupation with another activity, such as reading, or listening to music. Robert commonly observes this phenomena on the subway, noting that its passengers think about anything other than the experience of riding. The tendency to day dream is another daily occurrence. Funnily enough, waking up also bears uncanny resemblance to the aim of philosophy, which, in a sense, aims to awaken the mind. Amazingly, an activity that the average human spends a third of their life doing currently remains beyond our understanding. Analogously, science has yet to uncover the precise reasons for, and mechanisms behind, sleep. Science knows a great deal about the ecosystems on dry land but comparatively little about those in the ocean, particularly those in the ocean's deep recesses. One might compare our understanding of the brain to our understanding of ecology. Every day, humans slip out of consciousness while the the rest of the world continues on its way. The conversation continues to an examination of typical daily activities one of these is the seemingly ordinary phenomena of waking up after sleeping. Through this process, the individual enriches their perception and experience of daily life. Thus, one can, and should, smell the roses and philosophize about it in retrospect. They seek to engage with experience and increase mindfulness. While both observations bear truth, both methodologies actually share a central goal. The Socratic method, on the other hand, prepares for action. In support of Socrates, Zen connotes a form of passivity, as if one should let their life happen. That is, the Socratic method may conflict with a more Zen philosophy by detracting from the essence of the experience. On this point, Ken ponders the contrary: that the rich layer of experience may actually distract the individual. Thus, self-reflection adds a rich layer of experience. Otherwise, we might quickly find ourselves giving away money, overeating, and falling victim to illegitimate investment schemes. Firstly, examination is a critical faculty by applying it to everyday situations, we prevent the dogma of others from manipulating us. Still, several reasons persist in support of the examined life. Great art seems to come from a place where experience has remained unexamined, where the rational mind merely observes, withholding its filtering capabilities, refraining from examination. Another reason against the examined life derives from an appreciation of the artistic process. Yet, even in this scenario, one would at the very least have enriched their life with melodrama. After all, self-reflection and examination can transform an enjoyable day into a frustrating one. Now, not everybody will agree that the life worth living must be examined. One can indeed discover provoking insights from analyzing daily activities. Yet, they also have a knack for taking an intuitive assumption and uncovering the mystery of its inner workings. Some of these include the complexities of language, free will, and morality. This is unusual, because philosophers seem to examine more mysterious, or even esoteric, phenomena. Robert Rowland Smith, author of Breakfast with Socrates and Driving with Plato, joins Philosophy Talk to discuss what philosophy's take everyday life. Socrates claimed that the examined life is the only one worth living.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |